Posts

The Art Gallery Approach to Creative Problem Solving: What Curators Know That CEOs Don't

Walking through the National Gallery of Victoria last month, watching a curator rearrange an entire exhibition because "the lighting conversation wasn't working," I had one of those lightbulb moments that makes you question everything you thought you knew about problem-solving in business.

Here's the thing about curators that most business leaders completely miss. They don't start with the problem. They start with possibility.

Why Your Problem-Solving Framework Is Backwards

I've been running creative problem solving workshops for over 17 years now, and I can tell you with absolute certainty that 84% of corporate problem-solving approaches are fundamentally flawed. They begin with constraints instead of potential.

Art curators? Different story entirely. When faced with a challenge - say, displaying 47 contemporary pieces in a space designed for 23 classical works - they don't immediately start listing what won't work. They ask: "What story wants to be told here?"

That's revolutionary thinking in a business context. Most managers I work with in Melbourne and Sydney start every brainstorming session with budget limitations, resource constraints, and regulatory requirements. No wonder innovation feels like pulling teeth.

The Spatial Intelligence Factor

Here's where it gets interesting. Curators think spatially. They visualise relationships between elements that don't obviously connect. A 16th-century portrait might be positioned next to a modern installation not because they share a time period, but because they explore similar themes of identity and power.

Business leaders could learn volumes from this approach. Instead of forcing solutions into predetermined categories, what if we started exploring unexpected relationships between departments, processes, or market segments?

I remember working with a manufacturing client in Geelong who was struggling with quality control issues. Traditional approaches focused on tightening processes and adding inspection points. When we applied curatorial thinking, we discovered the real issue was a communication breakdown between design and production teams - they were speaking different visual languages. The solution involved creating a shared "exhibition space" where both teams could see how their work connected.

Sounds a bit woo-woo? Maybe. But it worked.

Permission to Be Wrong (And Publicly So)

Curators embrace what I call "productive failure." They'll hang an entire show, live with it for weeks, then completely rehang sections because new insights emerge. In business, we're terrified of this kind of iterative visibility.

I learned this lesson the hard way back in 2019 when I was consulting for a Perth-based logistics company. I'd developed what I thought was a brilliant problem-solving framework based on traditional Six Sigma methodology. It was comprehensive, logical, and completely wrong for their culture.

The team was creative, intuitive, and relationship-driven. My linear approach killed their natural problem-solving instincts. We had to start over, building something that felt more like curating an experience than following a checklist.

The Patience Problem

Here's what really separates curatorial thinking from typical business problem-solving: time perspective. Curators work in decades. Business leaders work in quarters.

This creates a fundamental tension. Real creative problem-solving requires what curators call "slow looking" - the ability to sit with ambiguity long enough for patterns to emerge. But business pressures demand quick fixes and immediate solutions.

The compromise? Build "exhibition periods" into your problem-solving process. Give teams permission to prototype solutions, test them in low-stakes environments, and iterate based on feedback. Just like curators do with gallery installations.

Beyond Brainstorming: The Salon Method

Traditional brainstorming sessions are the equivalent of throwing random artworks at a wall and hoping something sticks. Curators use a more sophisticated approach called salon-style conversations.

Instead of rapid-fire idea generation, salon conversations involve deep, meandering discussions where participants build on each other's observations. Ideas develop organically through dialogue rather than forced creativity exercises.

I've started incorporating this into my corporate training sessions, and the results are fascinating. Teams discover solutions they never would have reached through conventional brainstorming. The key is creating psychological safety for tangential thinking.

The Constraint Paradox

Curators work within incredible constraints - physical spaces, budgets, conservation requirements, insurance limitations. Yet they consistently produce innovative solutions. How?

They treat constraints as creative parameters rather than obstacles. A small gallery space doesn't limit their ambitions; it focuses their creativity. Limited budget doesn't reduce possibilities; it clarifies priorities.

This mindset shift is crucial for business problem-solving. Instead of starting meetings with "Here's what we can't do," try "Here's what these parameters make possible."

Making It Practical

So how do you actually implement curatorial thinking in your workplace? Start small.

Next time your team faces a significant challenge, spend the first 30 minutes exploring it like curators. Ask questions like: "What story is this problem trying to tell us?" or "What unexpected connections might reveal new possibilities?"

Document everything visually. Curators think with their eyes. Use whiteboards, sticky notes, mind maps - whatever helps your team see relationships between ideas.

Create exhibition periods for solutions. Instead of implementing fixes immediately, prototype them in controlled environments. Give yourselves permission to observe, adjust, and iterate.

The Human Factor

What I love most about curatorial approaches is their inherent humanity. Art galleries exist to create meaningful experiences for people. Business problem-solving often forgets this fundamental purpose.

Every business challenge ultimately involves human behaviour, needs, or relationships. Curatorial thinking keeps this front and centre by asking: "What experience are we trying to create?" rather than "What process are we trying to optimise?"

This shift in perspective can transform how teams approach everything from customer service issues to internal workflow problems.

Where I Got It Wrong

For years, I preached the gospel of systematic problem-solving frameworks. Linear processes, defined stages, measurable outcomes. All good things, but incomplete.

What I missed was the intuitive, relationship-based aspect of human creativity. Some problems can't be solved through logical analysis alone. They require what curators call "aesthetic judgment" - the ability to sense when something feels right even when you can't explain why.

Now I teach hybrid approaches that combine analytical rigour with curatorial intuition. It's messier than pure methodology, but it's also more effective for complex, human-centred challenges.

The Future of Problem-Solving

As artificial intelligence handles more routine problem-solving tasks, human creativity becomes increasingly valuable. The curatorial approach - with its emphasis on relationships, context, and meaning-making - represents a uniquely human contribution to organisational challenges.

Teams that learn to think like curators won't just solve problems more creatively; they'll identify opportunities that others miss entirely. They'll build solutions that resonate with human needs rather than just addressing technical requirements.

That gallery visit last month reminded me why I love this work. Watching professionals create meaningful experiences by thoughtfully arranging elements in space - that's exactly what we're trying to do in business, isn't it?

We're all curators of human experience. Some of us just haven't realised it yet.